This study conducts a critical discourse analysis of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte’s political speeches, aiming to uncover the underlying power dynamics, rhetorical strategies, and ideological constructs. By examining a selection of his public addresses, this research identifies recurring themes and linguistic patterns that characterize Duterte’s governance and political communication. The analysis explores how Duterte's rhetoric reflects and shapes socio-political realities in the Philippines, revealing his approaches to authority, populism, and national identity. Through this lens, the study offers insights into the broader implications of his discourse on public perception, policy-making, and democratic processes. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of political speech in contemporary governance and the construction of political authority.

Rodrigo Roa Duterte, Political speeches, Critical discourse analysis

Academic Research Guide ( 2013). Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge.

Aghagolzadeh & Bahrami-Khorshid (2009) .The power of discourse and the discourse of power: Pursuing peace through discourse intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies.3 (9) 20-29.

Alexander, C. (2005). Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy. Sociological Theory 22.4: 527-573. American Sociological Association. Web. JSTOR Archive.

Ary, E. (2002) . Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Barton S. & Hamilton T. (1998). Modernity and ambivalence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Batstone, D. (1995). Advances in discourse approaches. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Bayram, F.(2010). Ideology and political discourse: a critical discourse analysis of erdogan‟s political speech. ARECLS, 7(4), 23-40.

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Berg, T. (1998). Research methods in primary care. Oxon : Radcliffe Medical Press.

Blommaert , V. (2011). Critical discourse analysis: scrutinizing ideologically –driven discourses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 16(7) 25-31.

Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critic. International Pragmatics Association. (Pragmatics 21:4.493-525 , 2011)

Brno, T. (2011).Discourse analysis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Blommaert, A.(2002).Social psychology and discourse. Oxford, UK : Wiley - Blackwell .