
Shaping Social Interactions Through Emotionality
Laura Hınza , Andrei Saguna University Constanta Free International University of Moldova, RomaniaAbstract
The present study explores the correlations between the personality facet emotionality and the relational capacity of banking employees, focusing on dimensions such as cooperation, conflict management and emotional attachment. The research is based on a group of 152 participants from urban and rural areas, aged between 21 and 72, who completed a multiaxial questionnaire on the facet of emotionality (fear, anxiety, dependency, sentimentality) and various aspects of relational capacity. The results indicate a significant positive correlation between emotionality and the SRS dimensions studied. Specifically, a significant correlation was found between emotionality and cooperation (Spearman 0.20, p < 0.05), between emotionality and conflict management (Spearman 0.18, p < 0.05), and between emotionality and emotional attachment (Spearman 0.22, p < 0.01).
These results suggest that a higher prevalence of emotional traits may contribute to increased cooperation and conflict management capacity, as well as to the strengthening of emotional attachment within work relationships. In contrast, no significant correlations were identified between emotionality and the dimensions of networking, self-evaluation and persuasion.
The research hypothesis was confirmed, highlighting the importance of emotionality as a psychological factor influencing the professional relationships of banking employees. These findings have implications for the development of human resource management strategies and for improving organizational performance.
Keywords
Emotionality, cooperation, conflict management
References
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. În Richardson, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2012). The H Factor of Personality: Why Some People Are Manipulative, Self-Entitled, Materialistic, and Exploitive—and Why It Matters for Everyone. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. Harper and Row.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. În Pervin, L.A. & John, O.P. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford Press.
Zettler, I., Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., & de Vries, R. E. (2015). Dishonest responding in surveys: The role of impression management and the Dark Triad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038935
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Laura Hınza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.