This article discusses the USA new strategy in foreign policy. The country’s geopolitics essentially revolve around preserving the dollar’s hegemony. The State aims to acquire universal authority over world affairs, assets, and resources. The US is building up its military might, including by weakening its adversaries through a variety of covert means, to assure the security of its judgments. The pursuit of "liberal hegemony" has had far-reaching and negative consequences for American power. It has contributed to a decline in the US's military capability, weakened its economy, eroded its reputation and soft power. The multipolarity that the world is moving toward necessitates the capacity for diplomatic relations and negotiation.

USA new strategy, foreign policy, dollar’s hegemony

A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. Washington D.C.: The White House, July 1994. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. Washington D.C.: The White House, February 1995. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. Washington D.C.: The White House, February 1996. A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington D.C.: The White House, May 1997. A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington D.C.: The White House, October 1998. A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington D.C.: The White House, December 1999. A National Security Strategy for a Global Age. Washington D.C.: The White House, December 2000.

Anne-Marie Slaughter. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Babones, Salvatore (15 April 2008). "Studying Globalization: Methodological Issues". In George Ritzer (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Globalization. John Wiley & Sons. p. 146.

Barry R. Posen and Andrew L. Ross. Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy // International Security. Vol. 21, No. 3. Winter 1996/97, pp. 5–53. – http://www.comw.org/pda/14dec/fulltext/97posen.pdf

Chistopher Lane. The Unipolar Illusion Revisited // International Security. Vol. 31, № 2, Fall 2006, pp. 7–41.

Department of Defense Topline: FY 2001 – FY 2010. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/FY10%20Budget%20Request.pdf

East Asian Strategic Review 2009. National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS), Tokyo, Japan. May 2009, p. 59. – http//www.nids.go.jp/english.

Francis Fukuyama. The End of History and the Last Man. New York, 1992.

Fareed Zakaria. The Post-American World. New York, WW. Norton, 2008.

Giovanni Grevi. The Interpolar World: A New Scenario. Occasional Paper, № 79. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, June 2009.

Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World. National Intelligence Council, November 2008. – www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html

Ornstein, Norman J.; Perlman, Mark (1991). Political power and social change : the United States faces a united Europe

Robert Service, The End of the Cold War: 1985–1991 (Macmillan, 2015)

Thomas L. Friedman. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York, Farrar, 2005. 484 pp

Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. New York, Basic Books, 2004.

World: Thirst for Water. ISN Security Watch. 09.09.2009. – http://www.isn.ethz.ch.

Sayfullaev, D. B. (2020). Conceptual Basis of the Modern West and East Diplomacy Study. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 23, 1.

Sayfullaev, D. (2016). Parliamentary Diplomacy In Making Of Foreign Policy. The Advance Science Journal of International Relations, 1(1), 52-54.