A Comparative Study of Aristotle’s And Abu Nasr Al-Farabi’s Views on Categorial Knowledge

O. I. Stepanova , Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Acting Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Alfraganus University, Uzbekistan
Articles | Open Access

Abstract

Since Aristotle, the founder of formal logic, concepts, judgments, and inferences have been recognized as the principal logical forms of thought upon which higher levels of cognition—conceptual frameworks and theories—are founded. Throughout the history of logic, philosophers have paid varying degrees of attention to the characteristics of concepts as a form of thinking, often emphasizing the problem of the most general concepts, or categories. This article offers a comparative analysis of the approaches to categorial knowledge developed by Aristotle and Al-Farabi, an outstanding representative of the Eastern Peripatetic school.

Keywords

Logical form, categorial knowledge, hierarchy of concepts

References

Aristotle. Categories // Collected Works: In 4 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1978. P. 53.

Aristotle. Categories // Collected Works: In 4 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl, 1978. P. 56.

Sokolov V. V. Philosophy as the History of Philosophy. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2010. P. 201. [In Russian].

Makovelsky A. O. History of Logic. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole, 2004. P. 17. [In Russian].

Al-Farabi. On the Origin of the Sciences. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1975. P. 149.

Khairullaev M. M. Farabi: His Era and Teaching. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1975. P. 284. [In Russian].

Al-Farabi. Logical Treatises. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1975. Pp. 185–186.

Stepanova O. I. History and Theory of Logic. Tashkent: Yosh avlod matbaa, 2023. P. 71.

Uckelman S. L. Interactive Logic in the Middle Ages // Logic and Logical Philosophy. 2012. Vol. 21. P. 5.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

O. I. Stepanova. (2026). A Comparative Study of Aristotle’s And Abu Nasr Al-Farabi’s Views on Categorial Knowledge. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 6(10), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-06-10-05