Articles | Open Access | Vol. 6 No. 04 (2026): Volume 06 Issue 04

Platform-Mediated Labor, Algorithmic Governance, and Socio-Legal Inequality: A Critical Examination of the Gig Economy and Its Institutional Implications

Dr. Amelia R. Bennett , Department of Sociology and Labor Studies, University of Toronto, Canada

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the gig economy has fundamentally transformed labor markets, introducing flexible, on-demand work arrangements mediated by digital platforms. While this transformation has created new economic opportunities, it has also raised significant concerns regarding labor protections, income stability, and systemic inequality. This study presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the gig economy, drawing exclusively on established academic and policy literature. It explores the structural dynamics of platform-mediated labor, focusing on the tension between worker autonomy and algorithmic control. The study further examines the socio-economic implications of gig work, including the emergence of precarious employment, the erosion of traditional labor rights, and the increasing reliance on multiple income streams. Additionally, it investigates the intersection of algorithmic decision-making and systemic bias, highlighting parallels between labor platforms and broader concerns regarding artificial intelligence and inequality. Through an integrative methodological approach, the study synthesizes insights from labor economics, sociology, and legal studies to develop a nuanced understanding of gig work. The findings suggest that while gig platforms offer flexibility and accessibility, they often reproduce existing inequalities and introduce new forms of exploitation. The study concludes that addressing these challenges requires comprehensive regulatory reforms, enhanced worker protections, and greater transparency in algorithmic systems.

Keywords

Gig economy, platform labor, algorithmic control, labor rights, precarity, digital work, inequality

References

Aleksandric, M. (2023). Gig economy statistics for 2023: The state of gig work.

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias.

American Bar Association. (2015). Report on the uniformity of sentencing.

Berger, R. (2017). Reducing racial disparities in sentencing through AI.

Broughton, A., Gloster, R., Marvell, R., Green, M., & Martin, A. (2018). The experiences of individuals in the gig economy.

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the just-in-time workforce.

Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States.

Oyer, P. (2020). The gig economy.

Pugh, M. D., & Marsh, T. H. S. (2016). Gig work: Insights into the changing nature of employment.

Snider, L. (2018). Enabling exploitation: Law in the gig economy.

Stanford, J. (2016). The precariat: The new dangerous class.

US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Contingent and alternative employment summary.

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2016). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

R. Bennett, D. A. . (2026). Platform-Mediated Labor, Algorithmic Governance, and Socio-Legal Inequality: A Critical Examination of the Gig Economy and Its Institutional Implications. Frontline Marketing, Management and Economics Journal, 6(04), 12–17. Retrieved from https://frontlinejournals.org/journals/index.php/fmmej/article/view/905