Articles | Open Access | Vol. 6 No. 02 (2026): Volume 06 Issue 02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/marketing-fmmej-06-02-07

Evaluating the Contribution of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to GDP Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Economies

Norboev Sarvar Azodovich , Head of the Planning and Finance Department (PhD), Urgench State University named after Abu Rayhan Beruni, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This study evaluates the contribution of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to GDP growth in advanced economies and identifies the main mechanisms through which SME development influences macroeconomic performance. The research is based on a comparative and econometric approach that integrates regression analysis with country-level statistical data for Germany, the United States, Japan, and South Korea over the period 2020–2025. Key variables include SME share in GDP, employment, exports, productivity, investment, and innovation indicators. The findings are also interpreted in comparison with Uzbekistan to identify structural differences in SME-driven economic growth.

The results demonstrate that SMEs contribute approximately 45–55% of GDP in advanced economies and have a statistically significant positive impact on economic growth. Innovation, export orientation, and productivity are identified as the most influential channels through which SMEs affect GDP dynamics. Germany and South Korea exhibit export-driven SME growth models, while the United States demonstrates innovation- and entrepreneurship-based expansion. In Japan, SME productivity and investment play a decisive role in ensuring economic stability and supporting GDP growth. In contrast, SME contribution to GDP growth in Uzbekistan is primarily employment- and domestic-demand-driven.

Although the study is limited to selected advanced economies and relies on aggregated macroeconomic indicators, it provides important practical implications for economic policy. The findings highlight the need to strengthen innovation capacity, improve financial accessibility, support technological modernization, and promote export integration of SMEs to enhance their macroeconomic contribution. The study offers a comparative regression-based perspective and provides new insights into differences between innovation-driven and employment-driven SME development models in shaping GDP growth.

Keywords

SMEs, GDP growth, economic development, innovation

References

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Springer.

Agency of Statistics under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). Small business and private entrepreneurship in Uzbekistan: Statistical collection. Tashkent.

Asian Development Bank. (2021). Small and medium-sized enterprises development in Uzbekistan. Manila.

Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2001). What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.

Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Financial accessibility and SME lending report. Tashkent.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row.

International Labour Organization. (2023). Small enterprises and employment statistics. Geneva.

International Monetary Fund. (2023). Republic of Uzbekistan: Staff report and economic outlook. Washington, DC.

Karimov, I., & Khakimov, Z. (2020). The role of small business in regional economic development of Uzbekistan. Journal of Economic Studies of Uzbekistan.

Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

Ministry of Economic Development and Poverty Reduction of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Strategy for SME development and entrepreneurship support. Tashkent.

Muslimov, N. A. (2019). Institutional factors of entrepreneurship development in Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Fan Publishing.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2023). SME and entrepreneurship outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Development strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022–2026. Tashkent.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.

State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Investments and Foreign Trade. (2023). Annual report on export development and SME participation. Tashkent.

UNCTAD. (2022). World investment report. United Nations.

World Bank. (2022). Uzbekistan country economic update: Private sector and SME development. Washington, DC.

World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. World Bank.

Yadgarova, N. R. (2025). Innovative approaches to sustainable development of small business and private entrepreneurship. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review. ‏

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Norboev Sarvar Azodovich. (2026). Evaluating the Contribution of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to GDP Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Economies. Frontline Marketing, Management and Economics Journal, 6(02), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.37547/marketing-fmmej-06-02-07