
ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF SENIOR EXECUTIVES' STRATEGIC CHOICES ON COMPANIES LISTED IN ECONOMATICA'S CYCLICAL FUNDS SCREENING SECTOR
Ricardo Da Barros Rainatto , Researcher in Marketing and Consumer Behavior, Administration, Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas (FMU), São Paulo, BrazilAbstract
This research examines the influence of senior executives' strategic choices on companies listed in Economatica's cyclical funds screening sector. Senior executives play a crucial role in shaping the strategic direction of organizations, particularly in cyclical sectors that are sensitive to economic fluctuations. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of financial data, company reports, and executive decisions, this study explores the impact of strategic choices on financial performance, market position, and investor perceptions within the cyclical funds screening sector. The findings shed light on the significance of executive decision-making and its implications for companies' competitiveness and long-term sustainability in this specialized sector.
Keywords
Senior executives, strategic choices, cyclical funds screening sector
References
Aguinis H, Dalton DR, Bosco FA, Pierce CA, Dalton CM. Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management. 2011; 37(1):5-38.
Auh S, Menguc B. The influence of top management team functional diversity on strategic orientations: The moderating role of environmental turbulence and inter- functional coordination. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2005; 22(3):333-350.
Barkema HG, Shvyrkov O. Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion?. Strategic Management Journal. 2007; 28(7):663-680.
Boeker W. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management journal. 1997; 40(1):152-170.
Bunderson JS. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of Management journal. 2003; 46(4):458-474.
Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of management journal. 2002; 45(5):875-893.
Carney M, Gedajlovic ER, Heugens PP, Van Essen M, Van Oosterhout J. Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal. 2011; 54(3):437-460.
Carpenter MA. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2002; 23(3):275-284.
Child J. Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance part I. Journal of Management studies. 1974; 11(3):175-189.
Crossland C, Hambrick DC. How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal. 2007; 28(8):767-789.
Cyert RM, March JG. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963, 2.
Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC. Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal. 1988; 9(6):543-558.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ricardo Da Barros Rainatto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.