Articles | Open Access | Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): Volume 05 Issue 12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-05-12-03

The Foundations of The Sufi School of Transoxiana (Through The Example of The Hakimiyya and Khojagan-Naqshbandiya Connections)

Jurabek Chutmatov , PhD in History, Scientific fellow of the Imam Termizi International Research Center, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the school that was formed in the field of Sufism, an integral part of Islam, and its distinctive features within our country. In the context of today’s scientific achievements, the Sufi schools of the Islamic world are often not mentioned as part of Transoxiana, and there exists a tradition of associating it with the Khorasan school. The Sufi school of Transoxiana is mainly known through the activities of Abdulkhaliq al-Ghijduvani, the Seven Pir lineage, and Bahauddin Naqshband. However, one of the key early figures who laid the foundation of this field is Muhammad Hakim Termizi, whose contribution is of significant importance. The unification of these figures gives the school a distinctive character, which forms the basis of this tradition. It has been determined that there was a remarkable harmony in the teachings of such great leaders as al-Ghijduvani, Naqshband, and Muhammad Hakim Termizi. This unity, however, has sharp contrasts with other schools in the Islamic world. These distinct aspects and particularities necessitate the study of the Sufi path of Transoxiana as a "school," which remains underexplored both within our country and globally.

The distinctive features of the Transoxiana Sufi school, theoretically initiated by Muhammad Hakim Termizi, were practically elevated to their peak through the activities of Abdulkhaliq al-Ghijduvani and Bahauddin Naqshband. This school, during its time, manifested reformist movements that reflected the true essence of religion across the entire Islamic world. For example, al-Ghijduvani was the first to introduce the practice of secret dhikr (remembrance), while Bahauddin Naqshband solidified this practice and embodied its socialization through factors like conversation and the necessity of work, making it a foundation for personal spiritual growth. Both figures returned the idea that all Muslims should strive for knowledge and science as a fundamental principle of Sufism, and they introduced the system of “rashhahs” for the ascetics, thereby laying a high ideological foundation for disciplined and purposeful action. Most importantly, all the principles they introduced were recognized as a separate school in Transoxiana during the 10th-11th centuries and were built upon the theory of the “Hakimiyya” school, founded by Muhammad Hakim Termizi. Specifically, the principles of rashhahs, work, the unity of science, and many other aspects were the hallmarks of this school. 

Keywords

Iraq, Levant, Egypt, Andalusia

References

Nasirov I. Foundations of Islamic Mysticism. pp. 72-73. Author's sources: L. Massignon // Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam / Ed. by H.A.R. Gibb and J.H. Kramers. – Leiden: E.J.Brill, 1974, p. 580. Muhammad Gallob. al-Harakatu-t-tanassukiyya fi-l-qarnayni-l-avval wa-s-sani li-l-hijra. al-Azhar. – Cairo, 1960, pp. 57-58. Muhammad al-Adluni al-Idrisi. Ibn Masarra and his school. – Rabat: Dar al-bayda – Dar as-saqofa, 2000, pp. 12-15. Artur Sa`diyf (Artur Sagadeev). Tawfiq Salum. al-Falsafa al-arabiyya al-islamiyya. – Beirut: Dar al-Farabi, 2001, p. 277.

Çift S. Hakîm Tirmizî and his understanding of Sufism. p. 38. Author’s source: Yilmaz H. Kamil. Outline of Sufism and Orders. pp. 118-128.

Porso. Qudsiya. p. 5.

al-Khani. Hadaiq al-virdiyya. p. 160. Hasaniy M. Khoja Abdulkhaliq Gijduvani. pp. 69-70.

Safiy. Rashahot. p. 19.

Muhammad Sodiq. Concept of Sufism. pp. 83-84.

al-Khani. Hadaiq al-virdiyya. pp. 160-161, 173, 189. Hasaniy M. Khoja Abdulkhaliq Gijduvani. pp. 97-101.

Kholmuminov J. Jami and the doctrine of Wahdat al-Wujud. p. 9.

Sufism in Central Asia (foreign studies). Collection of articles.

al-Tirmiziy at-Hakim. Isbot al-ilal. p. 27. Çift S. Hakîm Tirmizî and his understanding of Sufism. pp. 244-245.

Navro’zova G. Hakim Tirmiziy and Bahouddin Naqshband // The role of Termez city in world civilization. pp. 12-14.

Radtke B. Theology and mysticism in Khorasan and Transoxiana // Sufism in Central Asia (foreign studies). p. 69. Navoi. Nasayim al-muhabbat. p. 79.

Chutmatov J. Some differing aspects of the views in the works of Khwarizmi Muhasibiy and Hakim Tirmiziy // Urgent issues of religious studies. pp. 261-264.

al-Tirmiziy at-Hakim. Navadir al-usul. II, p. 148.

Petrushevsky I. Islam in Iran in the 7th-15th centuries. pp. 344-345.

al-Khani. Hadaiq al-virdiyya. p. 160.

Muhammad Sodiq. Concept of Sufism. p. 96.

Navoi. Nasayim al-muhabbat. p. 257.

al-Hakim at-Tirmiziy. Javob Kitab mina-r-Ray // Salasa musonnifat lil Hakim Tirmiziy. p. 184.

Muhammad Baqir. Maqam of Khoja Naqshband. pp. 13-14. Bahouddin Naqshband Bukhari. pp. 146-147.

al-Hakim at-Tirmiziy. Tahsil al-nazair al-Qur’an. p. 51.

al-Hakim at-Tirmiziy. Navadir al-usul. III. p. 37.

Navoi. Nasayim al-muhabbat. p. 80.

Saloh ibn Mubarak. Anis at-tolibin. p. 28. Muhammad Baqir. Maqam of Khoja Naqshband. p. 32.

Muhammad Baqir. Maqam of Khoja Naqshband. p. 97.

Bartold V. Works on the history of Islam and the Arab Caliphate. VI, p. 118.

al-Istakhri. Kitab masalik al-mamalik. p. 314.

Muhammad Sodiq. Concept of Sufism. pp. 146-147.

Muhammad Baqir. Maqam of Khoja Naqshband. p. 164.

al-Hujwiri. Kashf al-mahjub. II, pp. 2, 442. Karamatov Kh. Ascetic and Sufi currents in Khorasan // From the history of Sufism: sources and social practice. Collection of articles, pp. 30-43.

Navro’zova G. Hakim Tirmiziy and Bahouddin Naqshband // The role of Termez city in world civilization. p. 14.

Saloh ibn Mubarak. Anis at-tolibin. p. 8.

Porso. Qudsiya. Introduction. pp. 74-75.

Bartold V. Works. Works on the history of Islam and the Arab Caliphate. VI, p. 115. Bartold V. Works on historical geography. III, p. 505.

Husainiy A. al-Ma’rifa inda al-Hakim at-Tirmiziy. p. 284.

Chabbi (Jacqueline). Remarks on the historical development of ascetic and mystical movements in Khorasan. Studia Islamica, XLVI, 1977, pp. 5-8. Source: Zahriy Kh. Hakimu Khorasan. – p. 31.

Uvatov U. Review of the Uzbek translation of the work "Manazil ul ibad min al-ibada" by the great thinker al-Hakim at-Tirmiziy // Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ali Hakim at-Tirmiziy. Manazil ul-ibad min al-ibada. p. 51.

Bahouddin Naqshband Bukhari. Edited and annotated by Yoldosh Eshbek. – Qarshi: Nasaf, 2010.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Jurabek Chutmatov. (2025). The Foundations of The Sufi School of Transoxiana (Through The Example of The Hakimiyya and Khojagan-Naqshbandiya Connections) . Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 5(12), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-05-12-03