
Aesthetic Enhancements Through Secondary Surgery After Orthognathic Treatment of Malocclusion
Boymuradov Shukhrat Abdujalilovich , DSc, Professor, Tashkent Medical Academy, Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Khasanov Adkham Ibrokhimovich , DSc, Professor, Tashkent State Dental Institute, Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Yusupov Shokhrukh Shukhratovich , PhD, Associate professor, Tashkent Medical Academy, Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Rakhmanov Shakhzod Alimovich , Clinical Resident, Tashkent Medical Academy, Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Madraimova Khonzoda , Master student, Tashkent Medical Academy, Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, UzbekistanAbstract
Orthognathic surgery significantly improves facial aesthetics and functional occlusion; however, secondary procedures are often required for optimal aesthetic results. This study analyzes the role of complementary surgical interventions, primarily genioplasty, in enhancing chin and jawline contours after orthognathic surgery. Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion frequently present with retrognathia or microgenia, necessitating chin augmentation through osteotomy and fixation. For Class II patients with excessive submental fat, liposuction and platysmaplasty refine the cervicomental angle. Additional procedures, such as cheek lifting, temporal lifting, and SMAS lifting, address facial sagging and deep nasolabial folds. Rhinoplasty is indicated in cases where nasal tip ptosis or dorsal hump formation occurs postoperatively. Patients with periorbital aging signs undergo blepharoplasty or forehead lifting to enhance facial harmony. In cases of thin bone structure or underdeveloped soft tissues, custom 3D implants made from PEEK, hydroxyapatite, or porous polyethylene are used to define the jawline and zygomatic region. This study evaluates aesthetic outcomes among 87 patients, highlighting the importance of individualized secondary surgeries for superior facial aesthetics.
Keywords
Orthognathic surgery, skeletal malocclusion, patient motivation, maxillofacial surgery
References
Farkas, L. G., & Kolar, J. C. (1987). Anthropometric proportions in the craniofacial regions. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 80(1), 17-25.
Posnick, J. C. (2014). Orthognathic Surgery: Principles and Practice. Saunders Elsevier.
Cheung, L. K., & Lo, J. (2007). Genioplasty in conjunction with orthognathic surgery: Indications and long-term stability. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 36(6), 511-520.
Mommaerts, M. Y. (2017). The necessity of genioplasty in maxillofacial orthognathic surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(6), 849-855.
Hwang, H. S., et al. (2015). Soft tissue response to surgical genioplasty: A three-dimensional evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148(1), 81-90.
Sarver, D. M. (2020). The importance of soft tissue considerations in orthognathic surgery. Clinical Plastic Surgery, 47(2), 245-256.
Alamillos-Granados, F. J., et al. (2001). Long-term stability of genioplasty combined with orthognathic surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 39(1), 49-54.
Guyuron, B., & DeLuca, L. (2012). Nasal changes following maxillary orthognathic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 129(1), 100-106.
Bartlett, S. P., et al. (2016). The role of facial implants in orthognathic surgery. Facial Plastic Surgery, 32(2), 179-185.
Rocchi, G., et al. (2018). The impact of chin augmentation on perceived facial attractiveness. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 38(5), 527-534.
Naini, F. B., et al. (2021). Genioplasty and its role in facial aesthetics: A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50(4), 432-445.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Boymuradov Shukhrat Abdujalilovich, Khasanov Adkham Ibrokhimovich, Yusupov Shokhrukh Shukhratovich, Rakhmanov Shakhzod Alimovich, Madraimova Khonzoda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.